Introduction
These days
more and more people (or at least governing bodies) are realizing that Waste
Management is indeed a big issue. Unfortunately there is only a little focus on
waste reduction, instead everyone is trying to see how to better manage the
waste that we are creating. Of course, it is one way of looking.
In this
context, we can see that many companies are starting up and various products
are becoming available in the market. Its really good trend, but at the same
time it is natural that some of them focus more on profit than real waste
management, and these companies/people might very well twist facts, tell lies
etc. to achieve their core objective i.e. money. Those who are trying to do something
good for environment, those who are trying to innovate – it wouldn’t be
appropriate to always look at them with suspicion, it wouldn’t be nice to
spread rumors about them. Hence, I try to be as careful as possible in this
regard. Here I am trying to share my review and opinion about a company called
NOWASTE http://nowaste.in
First
Impression
Initially I
heard about NOWASTE somewhere around July 2012. I learned that they have come
up with a great innovative incinerator (they hate to use the word incinerator
though), and that they have installed their equipment in many private hospitals
in Kerala. I also got some high level feedback that the management of such
hospitals are extremely happy with the results. These days private hospitals in
Kerala are facing too many challenges, pollution control board is also putting
unreasonable pressure on them (this is my personal view) – in this context, no
wonder management of such hospitals found this to be a simple solution.
After checking
their website, I felt that the effectiveness and magic in this solution is just
superficial; even basic level of environment enthusiasts can clearly see that
this solution is not solid. Naturally, I got concerned.
Initial
Contact
I sent them an
email and asked several questions. They did reply, but not to my satisfaction. Below
are more details:
1)
Kindly let me know how do you compare generic incinerator and CORT equipment on
various parameters?
Ans:
CORT Incinerator also comes under generic category. Only difference is that IT
WORKS WITHOUT ANY FUEL due to its constructional technique.
2)
Could you kindly quantify least minimum CO2 emission in your equipment? What
about emission of other gases?
Ans:
Depends upon the waste in put.
3)
What would the "Ash" contain? Could you explain it with some typical
waste examples? This is very important.
Ans:
Ash can be used as "manure".
4)
Regarding "Waste to Ash", what kind of quantity reduction we are
talking about here and eventually how to dispose the Ash off?
Ans:
100kgs reduces to max. 4-5 kgs of ashes.
5)
Would you recommend your product for bio-medical waste also?
Ans:
Not recommended for Bio-medical waste. However, almost 80% of the hospital
waste are non-bio medical waste and can be burned without fuel if used CORT.
6)
Is this product reviewed/recommended by any pro-environment
organizations/specialists? Kindly share the details.
Ans:
NA
7)
Is this product recognized/recommended by government pollution control boards?
Please share more details.
Ans:
It is an energy conserving one. It is acceptable as per rule for general
category of solid waste.
Important
observations
This company
has not highlighted the importance of recycling anywhere in their website. So,
obviously it cannot be one of those companies who are really concerned about
environment or green technology.
Alright, lets
assume that are just trying to solve an immediate social problem by providing a
new kind of incinerator with new technology, which maybe superior to existing
incinerators. But they have not attached any scientific data supporting their
claims. They have not obtained any quality certification, but went ahead and
boldly used ‘No Pollution’ promotion tag. To say that ash can be used as manure
is clearly irresponsible and unscientific answer.
Last but not
least, check their answer for question number 6, they seem to have no respect
or regards towards pro-environment experts and organizations.
Excerpts from
personal conversation
Along with
initial email reply, they had assured me that they will answer my questions at
more depth in person. So, in spite of getting a not-so-positive answer, I decided
to meet them personally.
Here are some
highlights from the meeting (a gentleman came to meet me, I don’t want to take
names here unnecessarily):
-
He claimed
that government pollution control board doesn’t provide any kind of
certification or approval to market-ready product, because everything depends
on the input waste. According to him, such checking and certification can
happen only “after installation” in real-life setup. This sounded absurd to me,
but we never know, government rules can sometimes be quite absurd, isn’t it?
-
Another
interesting remark: apparently senior officials from Kerala Pollution Control
Board gave him an informal green signal to go ahead and sell the equipment
throughout the state. Due to limitations of official processes and protocols,
they couldn’t help the company more than that, but apparently the board
acknowledged that the equipment will help in fulfilling the need of the hour.
-
However, I insisted
that he shows me scientific data that shows results for various kinds of input.
Then he acknowledged that such analysis is not yet done and results they claim
were based on visual observations only. He showed me some video that
demonstrated the usage, extent of smoke coming etc. and the whole thing looked
pretty naïve to me.
-
He further
claimed that some analysis is being planned and he will share the scientific
data within a month
-
He then said
that the technology was developed by an individual to meet his residential
needs and now being marketed at bigger level.
-
When I asked
about pro-environment experts and organizations, immediately he became annoyed
and little bit angry; he claimed that he or his company doesn’t care about what
such people/organizations say, because there are so many of them out there who are
idealistic and trouble causing, with no respect towards solutions that tackle
immediate needs of society in a practical way.
-
He also
claimed that it is not just hospitals who use their equipment. Apparently
southern railway also has started using it. I was bit surprised about this –
won’t government organizations have more protocols to follow before installing
such a thing?
Conclusion, so
far
It is quite
clear that what this company manufactures is basically an incinerator. Whether
it is better than other types available? Maybe, at least based on high level
observations. But I am convinced that this definitely cannot be environment
friendly, at least not through small scale equipment. Moreover, collective cost
of everyone installing their own incinerator makes no sense at all.
But what other
solution do we have really? Check the Kerala State Pollution Control Board’s
website: http://www.keralapcb.org/
-> Activities -> Municipal Solid Wastes. Clearly there is lot of
responsibility that is currently assigned to municipalities, and they are
unable to fulfill these obligations due to various reasons. In their website,
they are not even recommending any companies or products specifically, maybe
they are not allowed to do so. (I am yet to personally meet pollution control
board officials or any government authorities in this regard.)
Overall, in
this context, incineration seems to be the only practical way out for most
establishments. And further, NOWASTE might not be such a bad deal after all. Meanwhile,
I hope everyone continues their efforts towards waste reduction through
Refuse/Reduce/Reuse/Recycle techniques as well as effective segregation.
1 comments:
Thank you Dr Shastri for this useful input.Many hospitals may jump into the new technology without giving any further thought . Your article was enlightening
Post a Comment